SpaceX priced the biggest IPO ever at $135 a share, then SPCX opened at $150, ran to $176.52 and closed Friday at $161.11, up more than 19% and worth above $2 trillion. The euphoria is real. So is a $4.9 billion net loss, a 4.3% float and a founder with 85% of the votes. This is the full institutional read of the deal, the S-1 financials, the banks' bull case and the risks underneath the rocket.
On Friday 12 June 2026, the most anticipated listing of the decade finally hit the tape. SpaceX, the rocket and satellite company Elon Musk built over two decades in private hands, began trading on the Nasdaq under the ticker SPCX. It did so as the largest initial public offering in the history of capital markets, raising roughly $75 billion at a deal valuation near $1.77 trillion, a figure that eclipses Saudi Aramco's 2019 record by a factor of nearly three on capital raised. By the closing bell the stock had done what every retail buyer hoped and every short seller feared, and the company's market value had pushed above $2 trillion.
This is the full institutional read. Not the headline pop, but the anatomy of the deal: how the shares actually traded on day one, what the S-1 reveals about a business that earns billions and still loses billions, how Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley build a model that justifies the price, why Morningstar thinks the stock is worth less than half of it, and the structural risks, governance, float, lock-up and key-man, that decide whether SPCX is a generational compounder or the top tick of a space bubble.
SPCX priced at $135 after the close on 11 June, opened at $150 (an 11% gap up), ran as high as $176.52 intraday, and closed at $161.11, up 19.3% from the IPO price. More than 360 million shares changed hands, roughly ten times the first-day volume of Cerebras, the year's second-largest IPO. The close lifted SpaceX's market capitalisation above $2 trillion, making it the seventh-largest US public company, ahead of Tesla at about $1.6 trillion. SpaceX is the first of an expected wave of mega-listings: both Anthropic and OpenAI are reported to be readying offerings of their own.
The numbers are historic in every dimension. SpaceX sold 555.6 million Class A shares at a fixed $135, for gross proceeds near $75 billion, with the underwriters holding a greenshoe option on a further 83.33 million shares (about $11.2 billion) that can be exercised into the demand. For scale: Saudi Aramco's 2019 listing, the prior record, raised $25.6 billion. SpaceX raised almost three times that.
The defining feature of the structure is not the size of the raise but the size of the float. Despite the record dollar amount, SpaceX put only about 4.3% of the company into public hands. That is more than the 1.5% Saudi Aramco floated in 2019, but it sits in the same category: a colossal valuation supported by a tiny tradable supply. A second deliberate choice points the other way: SpaceX reserved up to 30% of the offering for retail investors, three to six times the 5–10% typical of a Wall Street deal, a populist allocation in keeping with Musk's retail following and one that helped fuel Friday's demand.
This was Wall Street's deal of the decade and the syndicate reflected it. SpaceX lined up 21 banks, with Goldman Sachs in the lead-left position, followed by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase. Notably, SpaceX is reported to have negotiated unusually thin underwriting fees, so the banks' reward is less the fee line than the league-table credit and the relationships that follow the largest IPO ever priced.
The lead banks also did the heavy lifting on the valuation case, and this is where the institutional debate really lives. Because two of them published growth models that do not remotely agree with each other.
SpaceX filed its S-1 on 20 May, the first real look inside the company's books. The story it tells is of a business growing fast, generating serious cash in one division, and bleeding it in another.
| Metric (FY2025) | Figure | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|
| Total revenue | $18.7B (+33% YoY) | Up from $14.1B in 2024; genuine top-line momentum |
| Net loss | −$4.9B | Still deeply unprofitable on a GAAP basis |
| Operating loss | −$2.6B | Core operations lose money before financing |
| Adjusted EBITDA | +$6.6B | The bull's number; positive once non-cash and one-offs are stripped |
| Accumulated deficit | −$41.3B | Two decades of investment not yet recovered (as of 31 Mar 2026) |
The single most important fact in the filing is that SpaceX is really three businesses with three completely different financial profiles, and the IPO bundles them into one ticker.
Starlink is the reason this IPO works. The Connectivity segment generated $11.4 billion in 2025 revenue, about 61% of the company, and crucially it posted an operating profit of $4.4 billion. It is the only segment that is consistently profitable on a GAAP basis. Starlink passed 10 million active customers across 160 countries by February 2026, and it is the recurring, subscription-like cash flow that the whole valuation leans on. If you are buying SPCX, you are mostly buying Starlink.
The original business, Falcon launches and crew and cargo services to NASA, generated about $4 billion in 2025. It is the operational moat, the cheapest reliable ride to orbit on earth, but it also carries the heaviest investment line: roughly $3 billion of R&D poured into Starship, the next-generation vehicle that is essential to the long-term story and not yet a profit centre.
The most controversial line is the recently folded-in AI segment from xAI. It contributed $3.2 billion of revenue in 2025, but it lost roughly $6.4 billion in the process. In other words, the AI division alone lost more than the entire company's net loss; without it, SpaceX's core would look far closer to break-even. The AI segment is simultaneously where the banks see the most upside and where the skeptics see the most aggressive accounting.
To justify paying north of 90 times trailing sales for a loss-making company, you have to underwrite an extraordinary future. The lead banks did, and the gap between their models is itself a warning about how speculative the exercise is.
The bull case, distilled: Starlink is a global, capital-light-at-the-margin subscription utility with a multi-year head start and 10 million paying customers already; Starship structurally collapses the cost of launch and opens entirely new markets; and xAI gives the group a call option on the largest technology theme of the decade, fed by SpaceX's own data and compute. Each leg is plausible. The valuation requires all three to compound for fifteen years.
Now the other side, because a desk that only tells you the bull case is selling, not analysing. At $135, SpaceX trades around 90 to 100 times trailing revenue and on a deeply negative earnings base. Translate the multiple into the earnings it implies and the number is sobering: to support a roughly 30x earnings multiple on the $135 price, SpaceX would need to generate on the order of $60 billion of annual net income. The company lost $4.9 billion last year. That is not a gap you close with operating leverage; it requires a near-total transformation of the business model, sustained for years, executed flawlessly.
The independent voices are blunt about it. Morningstar called the company "overvalued" and put fair value at roughly $780 billion, well under half the IPO valuation. The first-day surge to above $2 trillion only widens that gap. The bear case does not argue SpaceX is a bad company, it argues SPCX is a richly priced stock, and that those are very different statements.
Morgan Stanley sees $3.4 trillion of revenue by 2040. Morningstar sees fair value at $780 billion today. The spread between the most bullish underwriter and the most cautious independent is the single best summary of how wide the range of outcomes is. When the analyst dispersion is this large, position size is the real risk control, not the entry price.
Beyond valuation, the structure of the deal itself carries risks that institutional investors are flagging hard.
Musk holds roughly 42% of the equity but about 85% of the voting power, and is locked up for 366 days. Public shareholders get economic exposure with almost no governance rights: limited say over capital allocation, related-party transactions, strategic direction or board accountability. The charter even renounces any expectation that Musk prioritises SpaceX opportunities over his other ventures. Senator Elizabeth Warren publicly urged the SEC to delay the listing, citing both the valuation and the governance, and at least one European asset manager (Finland's Aktia) declined to participate, naming Musk's control as an explicit additional risk factor.
The AI segment came from xAI, another Musk-controlled entity, folded into SpaceX. That raises exactly the conflict Warren flagged: the potential for "inaccurate or misleading" valuation around an acquisition where the buyer and the seller answer to the same person. Given that the AI division both drives much of the bull-case upside and accounts for the bulk of the losses, how it is valued and accounted for is not a footnote, it is central to the thesis.
A 4.3% float cuts both ways. On the way up, thin supply means modest buying produces outsized moves, which is part of why Friday ran so hard. On the way down, the same thinness means volatility can be violent, and the real test is the lock-up schedule. A roughly 5% friends-and-family carve-out carries no lock-up, so on the order of $3.75 billion of stock could reach the market almost immediately. The broader insider lock-up runs 180 days, with about 28% unlocking after the Q3 earnings report and the remainder at the 180-day mark. Each unlock is a step-up in tradable supply against a stock priced for perfection. Index inclusion, and the forced buying it would bring, is itself complicated by the tiny float, and the major index providers are still working out how to treat it.
The thesis is inseparable from one person, who also runs Tesla, xAI and X and is politically exposed. And the operational story still leans on Starship, a vehicle that is consuming billions in R&D and has not yet proven its economics. A program slip or a high-profile failure would hit the most future-weighted part of the valuation hardest.
A $2 trillion debut does not trade in a vacuum. The read-throughs:
A newly listed mega-cap on a thin float is a volatility instrument first and an investment second, at least until the lock-ups clear and a real shareholder base forms. We treat SPCX as a structured event rather than a single price: the bull and bear models side by side, the segment-level economics (Starlink profit versus AI losses) rather than the blended headline, the lock-up calendar as the forward supply curve, and the cross-asset read into Tesla, the space names and the coming AI listings. Expect wide ranges and gap risk around the first earnings report and each unlock date. The edge is not in guessing Friday's close, it is in knowing which of the bank models the next print confirms or breaks.
SpaceX's debut is genuinely historic: the largest IPO ever, a 19% first-day gain, a $2 trillion company born in an afternoon. Underneath the celebration sits a more demanding picture. This is a company with one outstanding, profitable business (Starlink), one strategic moat that still burns cash (Starship), and one loss-making call option (xAI), wrapped in a valuation that needs all three to compound for a decade and a half, sold on a 4.3% float with 85% of the votes in one man's hands. The bull case, underwritten by Morgan Stanley and Goldman, is a multi-trillion-dollar future. The bear case, voiced by Morningstar, is a stock worth less than half of Friday's price. Both can look right for a long time. For now, respect the momentum, size for the volatility, and watch the lock-up calendar more closely than the launch pad.
Figures are drawn from SpaceX's S-1 prospectus, first-day market data and analyst and press coverage as of publication (sources include CNBC, CNN Business, NPR, NBC News, Fortune, Yahoo Finance, Morningstar, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs research as reported, Via Satellite, Hargreaves Lansdown, Al Jazeera and public remarks by Senator Elizabeth Warren) and are subject to revision. This article is TTerminal's own market analysis and is not investment advice. Trading and investing carry risk of loss.
SPCX, the space and satellite complex, Tesla, the AI listings and the cross-asset map, all live across equities, indices, commodities, forex and crypto.
Start 7-day free trial ↗